At Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:09:23 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tend to agree (I also thought this as an option myself). Thanks for > the suggestion. I've updated the AUTH48 version of rfc2462bis with this fix. Other (major) changes since the latest version of I-D (rfc2462bis-08) are: - Updates to RFC references: + RFC3041 -> RFC4941 (which will be published at the same timing) + RFC3513 -> RFC4291 - Wording clarification about interface identifiers (see discussion in the thread that began with this post: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05163.html) Note that I didn't include any change about the strictness of DAD. I didn't see any consensus on including that at this very final stage. I'm about to submit this version to the RFC editor, but a copy of the release candidate is available here: http://www.jinmei.org/rfc4862-candidate.txt just in case. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
