Hi Ed, That would be great. If the comparison is useful, we can then include it as an appendix or at least discuss some of the differences.
thanks, John >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Ed Jankiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 25 February, 2008 10:21 >To: ipv6@ietf.org >Cc: Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC; Loughney John >(Nokia-OCTO/PaloAlto) >Subject: Re: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED) > >I recently took a pass through both the USG and DoD documents >to identify differences. I am also planning to compare the >DoD doc against this draft. I will gladly share those >comparisons with this list, and hope to have it done this >week, certainly before the IETF meeting in two weeks. > >Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC wrote: >> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED >> Caveats: NONE >> >> John- >> >> I can give you the 2 documents: >> >> DoD IPv6 Standards Profile, Version 2: >> >http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/apl/ipv6/pdf/disr_ipv6_product_profile_v2.pdf >> >> US Government IPv6 Profile Version 1, Draft 2: >> http://www.antd.nist.gov/usgv6/usgv6-v1-draft2.pdf >> >> I would suggest you look at it in the context of the RFC. >The reason >> is because these two are different as well. >> >> >> 01010011 01100101 01101101 01110000 01100101 01110010 01000110 >> 01101001 >> >> Jeremy Duncan >> >> Joint Interoperability Test Command >> IPv6 Test and Evaluation >> ManTech Telecommunications & Information Systems >> Office: 703-814-8384 >> Cell: 520-226-1789 >> __________________________________________________ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:07 PM >> To: Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC; ipv6@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED) >> >> Jeremy, >> >> >>> Is there also anyway the new node requirements RFC could be >somewhat >>> reconciled with the new US Government IPv6 Profile and the DoD IPv6 >>> Profile? >>> It would probably keep the confusion down a bit. >>> >> >> Would you be able to provide a summary of the differences? Also, are >> the US Government & the DoD IPv6 profiles publically available? >> >> What we could potentially do is look at resolving any major >conflicts, >> if possible - or at least have an informative appendix covering this. >> >> Thoughts? >> John >> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED >> Caveats: NONE >> >> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >-- >Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International >Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research Supporting DISA >Standards Engineering Branch >732-389-1003 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
