I recently took a pass through both the USG and DoD documents to identify differences. I am also planning to compare the DoD doc against this draft. I will gladly share those comparisons with this list, and hope to have it done this week, certainly before the IETF meeting in two weeks.
Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC wrote: > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > John- > > I can give you the 2 documents: > > DoD IPv6 Standards Profile, Version 2: > http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/apl/ipv6/pdf/disr_ipv6_product_profile_v2.pdf > > US Government IPv6 Profile Version 1, Draft 2: > http://www.antd.nist.gov/usgv6/usgv6-v1-draft2.pdf > > I would suggest you look at it in the context of the RFC. The reason is > because these two are different as well. > > > 01010011 01100101 01101101 01110000 01100101 01110010 01000110 01101001 > > Jeremy Duncan > > Joint Interoperability Test Command > IPv6 Test and Evaluation > ManTech Telecommunications & Information Systems > Office: 703-814-8384 > Cell: 520-226-1789 > __________________________________________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:07 PM > To: Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Jeremy, > > >> Is there also anyway the new node requirements RFC could be somewhat >> reconciled with the new US Government IPv6 Profile and the DoD IPv6 >> Profile? >> It would probably keep the confusion down a bit. >> > > Would you be able to provide a summary of the differences? Also, are the US > Government & the DoD IPv6 profiles publically available? > > What we could potentially do is look at resolving any major conflicts, if > possible - or at least have an informative appendix covering this. > > Thoughts? > John > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch 732-389-1003 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
