Hi Brian, 6man WG, Sorry for the delay in publishing. Comments/Suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-02.txt Abstract: On inter-router point-to-point links, it is useful for security and other reasons, to use 127-bit IPv6 prefixes. Such a practice parallels the use of 31-bit prefixes in IPv4 [RFC3021]. This document outlines some of these reasons and specifies that 127-bit IPv6 prefix lengths must be supported on such links. Thanks, Miya -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:56 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hi Chris, On 7/28/10 6:49 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > (can we call the question in a clean/new email about adoption pls? > There was interest in the room for same.) That is what I said I would do as soon as the draft is published. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
