Hi Brian, On 10-08-04 11:58 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
Seiichi,First off, this type of change is not appropriate for AUTH48.
I am not certain whether this is appropriate, but I think this issue should be fixed before publication. Otherwise the document fails to achieve its stated goal. e.g. An address
2001:db8:0:0:0:0:2:1 can still show up as either 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:2:1 or 2001:db8::2:1 and still be compliant to this document. My original suggestion to fix this was to add a sub section 4.2.0 Mandatory usage If the address contains at least two consecutive 16-bit 0 fields, "::" MUST be used to compress consecutive 16-bit 0 fields as described in the following sections. I also like Roman's suggested text. Cheers Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
