On 8/4/10 12:15 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On 10-08-04 11:58 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> Seiichi, >> >> First off, this type of change is not appropriate for AUTH48. > > I am not certain whether this is appropriate, but I think this issue > should be fixed before publication. Otherwise the document fails to > achieve its stated goal. e.g. An address > > 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:2:1 > > can still show up as either > > 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:2:1 or 2001:db8::2:1
I don't see how given the text in section 4.2.1 says that the symbol "::" MUST be used to its maximum capability. > > and still be compliant to this document. > > My original suggestion to fix this was to add a sub section > > 4.2.0 Mandatory usage > If the address contains at least two consecutive 16-bit 0 fields, > "::" MUST be used to compress consecutive 16-bit 0 fields as described > in the following sections. > > I also like Roman's suggested text. > > Cheers > Suresh > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
