On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Operationally the vendors may be violating some RFC, so lets publish what is > relevant and working today so we can all move on? We can deal with > any additional updates and items with "how IPv6" works elsewhere or in a > new document so we can move /127 on p2p links along?
I like this as well.. if other link types would like special handling can't they also gin up some rfc-text and refer to the work done here as a stepping stone to their answer? -Chris -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
