On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:33:04AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > There is no way this is an erratum. There was a clear choice in the WG > to standardise on lower case.
[...] > In any case I would object to this erratum being accepted. I agree that the errata should be rejected - erratas are the wrong procedure to question working group decisions. That said, let me add that I support the decision documented in RFC 5952 (and which is also codified in RFC 6021). /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
