Russ, On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Stephen: > > Comments below. > > Russ > > >> From: IETF Security Area >> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3 >> Title: Work on Security of IPv6 >> >> FOR ACTION >> >> The IETF thanks Study Group 17 for its liaison LS-206 "Liaison on IPv6 >> security issues". As the world transitions to IPv6, new opportunities >> and challenges and challenges arise. SG17's new focus on deployment and > > s/and challenges and challenges/and challenges/ > s/new// > >> implementation considerations reflects this reality. We would like to >> bring to your attention the following work which we believe may prove a >> useful basis for both X.ipv6-secguide and X.mgv6: >> >> * RFC 4294 – "IPv6 Node Requirements" (N.B., this work is currently >> under revision) > > Why not just reference the bis document? > >> * draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis (work in progress) – "IPv6 Node >> Requirements RFC 4294-bis" The draft could also say that the working group has reached consensus and has submitted it to the IESG for publication on 25 May 2011. Bob >> * RFC 4864 – "Local Network Protection for IPv6" >> * RFC 6092 – "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer >> Premise Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet >> Service" >> * RFC 6105 – "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard" >> * RFC 6106 – "IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS >> Configuration", §7 in particular. >> >> As you are aware, every RFC contains a Security Considerations section. >> In developing either a implementation or deployment guide, contributors >> are strongly encouraged to review the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that >> support any underlying function. >> >> In addition, we bring to your attention the following IETF Working >> Groups that are working on security-related work of IPv6: >> >> Working Group Purpose Mailing list address >> Name >> >> 6man IPv6 Maintenance ipv6@ietf.org >> savi Source Address Validation s...@ietf.org >> Improvements >> dhc Dynamic Host Configuration dh...@ietf.org >> v6ops IPv6 Operations v6...@ietf.org >> opsec Operational Security op...@ietf.org >> Capabilities for an IP >> Network >> >> In addition to the above working groups, the Security Area of the IETF >> maintains a mailing list for general discussion, s...@ietf.org. We >> encourage and invite open and informal discussion in these or other >> relevant IETF fora on this very important topic. As with all IETF >> working groups, any and all interested parties can choose to directly >> contribute via the mailing lists above. >> >> As in other areas, the Security Area of the IETF invites SG17 to bring >> any new-found concerns about IETF protocols to our attention so that as >> and when we revise our documents we can make appropriate amendments to >> IETF protocols. In particular, as this planned work matures, we would >> welcome hearing about it in more detail, perhaps via an invited >> presentation at a saag meeting or via review of draft documents as may >> be appropriate. > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
