On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > I agree, that's the deployment model I advocate for hostile scenarios. Use > DHCPv6 for stateful addressing, advertise default GW via RA, don't advertise > any on-link prefix, and make sure hosts can't L2 communicate at all with each > other by means of enforcement in switches (or just separate them into > different L2 domains).
Huh. If I had a choice between RA and multicast, I think I'd choose multicast. When you have to utterly cripple your technology in order to continue using a protocol, I think it's time to ask whether or not the protocol you're using is the right protocol at all. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
