>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Sander
>> Steffann
>> 发送时间: 2011年12月22日 17:04
>> 收件人: Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
>> 抄送: 6man Mailing List
>> 主题: Re: IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for NTP Server Configuration
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Different operators have different requirements and preferences based on
>> their environments. I have seen deployments where SLAAC is much more
>> useful than DHCPv6. I've seen deployments where DHCPv6 is needed. So both
>> have a place and we should let the operators decide what they want to use.
>> Environments with 4 to 20 devices in them (small businesses) may not want
>> the complexity of setting up a central server. Those environments are
>> probably more suited for SLAAC.
>>
>> SLAAC + Stateless DHCPv6. I agree that a central Stateful DHCPv6 server is
>> too complex for such a situation, but come on: a stateless DHCPv6 server is
>> simple….
>>
[Dacheng Zhang]
But in this case, we still need to deploy a server... If we can use RAs in such
environments, even a stateless DHCP server is not necessary. Please correct me
if I am wrong or miss anything.
>> - Sander
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
