Hi, >>> SLAAC + Stateless DHCPv6. I agree that a central Stateful DHCPv6 server is >>> too complex for such a situation, but come on: a stateless DHCPv6 server is >>> simple…. > [Dacheng Zhang] > But in this case, we still need to deploy a server... If we can use RAs in > such environments, even a stateless DHCP server is not necessary. Please > correct me if I am wrong or miss anything.
Depends on how you see 'deploying a server'. Your router can easily perform the stateless DHCPv6 server function. Even tiny CPEs can do that these days, and Cisco has been doing that for ages. - Sander
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
