Sent from my iPad

On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:45 AM, "Florian Weimer" <fwei...@bfk.de> wrote:

> * Fernando Gont:
> 
>> In that case, you're not required to split your packets into fragments
>> smaller or equal to 1280 bytes, but *are* required to react by including
>> a Fragment Header in subsequent packets.
> 
> And the only way to achieve that reliably in certain existing
> deployments appears to be to send a fragment header unconditionally.
> (And with increasing IPv6 adoption, this will be only option for every
> large DNS operator---right now, PMTUD in the IPv6 stack appears to work
> because the number of clients is small compared to the size of the
> destination cache in the servers.)
> 
> Steinar wrote that atomic fragments break FreeBSD 7.4 (and there might
> be others, of course).  Not sending them breaks important transition
> technology.
> 
>>> Without the API change in draft-andrews-6man-force-fragmentation, it is
>>> flat out impossible to server IPv6 traffic in a stateless fashion.  The
>>> stack is required to keep a per-destination cache which records the
>>> necessity of a fragment extension header, even if the application never
>>> sends any packets larger than 1280 bytes.
>> 
>> The stack is required to have a Destination Cache, anyway.
> 
> Could you elaborate on that?  For some operators, the ability to serve
> stateless protocols statelessly over IPv6 is quite important.  I'm not
> aware of any fundamental requirement for per-destination bookkeeping in
> IPv6 nodes.
> 
>>>> Sorry, I cannot see why some packets would require going through a
>>>> translator, while others wouldn't.
>>> 
>>> The joy of packet switching. 8-)
>> 
>> If a packet is actually destined to the IPv4 world (and hence needs to
>> go through a translator), it will need to cross one translator, or
>> another... but *some* translator.
> 
> Couldn't it be translated back to IPv6?  Then there could be an
> IPv6-only path between sender and recipient.
I'm deploying it. It's hard to find.
> 
> -- 
> Florian Weimer                <fwei...@bfk.de>
> BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
> Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
> D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to