Randy, On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> "The IID consists of N bits that have no meaning; the only constraint >> >> Hmm.. how would this work with RFC5453 reserved IID space we already >> have for anycast addresses? > > is anyone aware of any deployment of the ipv6 invented anycast? > > like most ipv6 magic, i think it is ignored and regular old ipv4-style > anycast is used. I assume you mean the subnet-anycast addresses (i.e., Subnet-Router anycast address). IPv6 has always had what you call regular old ipv4-style anycast. See section 2.6 of RFC4291. Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
