On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Rémi Després <despres.r...@laposte.net> wrote: > Ole, Roland, > > Could we limit the 6man discussion to the question asked by Softwire, i.e. > whether new IID types can be defined, using u=g=1, with a first one for 4rd, > is compatible with the current IPv6 specification?
sorry, but you start to really annoy me, who are you that can tell us what we can and not discuss in this wg? -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
