On 12/19/2012 07:37 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > [...] > >> I briefly read into the 4rd draft, but it's not entirely clear to me >> whether other solutions don't exist. Maybe there are other means to >> get the context knowledge that this particular IPv6 address has a >> special structure encoded somehow. > > as a clarification of what has happened in softwire. (Suresh, please correct > me if I'm wrong.) > > the softwire working group has chosen to standardize "MAP-E > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-02)" as the solution for > stateless A+P. the two competing proposals MAP-T (dIVI) and 4rd are being > published on experimental track.
I can confirm this is the case. The proposal in question (4rd) is an alternative (experimental) solution to the MAP-E standards track solution. Thanks Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
