I think you misunderstanding my idea. Multiple user is definitely fine. It is very useful for data protection.
But, ****binding multiple user with multiple seats, multiple displays*** will be not good. That is what I want to express. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominig Ar Foll [mailto:dominig.arf...@fridu.net] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:16 PM > To: Wang, Quanxian > Cc: Jussi Laako; ivi@lists.tizen.org > Subject: Re: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture > > 2014-10-20 9:05 GMT+02:00 Wang, Quanxian <quanxian.w...@intel.com>: > > > > [Wang, Quanxian] For privacy, permission control. Multi user will be fine. > But in one car, do you really need that? > > At least, I don't think multiple displays are not related with much more > privacy. It should focus on the convenience how to use IVI system. > > You may think what you want but you can be assured that car manufacturers > and equipment manufacturers want to protect user data between users. > Not every one accept to see any user of their car alternative > drivers/passengers have access to their private data such as last calls, last > visiting places, emails, ... > > With the IVI system in the car becoming an extension of the Mobile phone, > by providing access to phone Apps while on the move, user private data > protection has become a key requirement. > > Would you like the guy renting a car after you, having access to your previous > calls, SMS and visiting places ? > Once you add Facebook messages and other more personal services access, > that issue become just worse. > > One of the key value of Tizen 3 is to provide embedded security and private > data protection and it has been hard enough to add those protections in > Tizen 3, to be quite tough in not letting anyone put at risk these > protections. > > > -- > Dominig ar Foll > Senior Software Architect > Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list IVI@lists.tizen.org https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
