Are these characterizations right? - If Ant isn't bundled, then there's no shell files, and build.xml and build.properties can be dropped in the project root, just like Makefiles. Nice, simple and intuitive. - If Ant isn't bundled, then dependencies becomes a hassle. - The dependency problem can be solved by a commons/lib directory, containing optional.jar, junit.jar, xerces1.2.2.jar, etc. The INSTALL doc then tells people to drop this stuff in $ANT_HOME/lib, if it's not already there. Otherwise it's back to bundling Ant, script files, "build" directories, etc, which would be sad. --Jeff
- Build Scripts Redux Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Michael L. Heuer
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Peter Donald
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Peter Donald
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Jeff Turner
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Jeff Turner
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Jeff Turner
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Peter Donald
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Build Scripts Redux Vincent Massol
- [cactus] Add functional tests to... Vincent Massol
- Re: [cactus] Add functional ... Jim Cheesman
- Re: [cactus] Add functio... Vincent Massol
- Re: [cactus] Add functio... Jim Cheesman