> > The RFC 2109 states that the domain part for setting a cookie is optional > > but the Cookie.java class mandates a domain and throws an exception if > none > > is specified. > > > > Could we add a new constructor with no domain or rather only provide a > > constructor with mandatory paramaters and provide setters for optional > > paramaters ? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > Yes, we can do that. > > > > I'd leave the current constructors in, though (API compatibility :-)). > > I only wish API compatibility were done sooner... I know :-) (Sorry) Remy
- HttpClient and HttpMethodBase.setParameter() Vincent Massol
- HttpClient, clones and future Vincent Massol
- Re: HttpClient, clones and future Remy Maucherat
- Re: HttpClient and HttpMethodBase.setParameter() Remy Maucherat
- Re: HttpClient setQuery() Remy Maucherat
- HttpClient and some public methods Vincent Massol
- HttpClient and response design Vincent Massol
- HttpClient and Cookie bug Vincent Massol
- Re: HttpClient and Cookie bug Remy Maucherat
- Re: HttpClient and Cookie bug Scott Sanders
- Link problem on Commons web page Remy Maucherat
- Link problem on Commons web page Jim Cheesman
- Re: HttpClient and response design Remy Maucherat
- Re: HttpClient and response design Scott Sanders
- Re: HttpClient and response design Vincent Massol
- Re: HttpClient and response design Scott Sanders
- Re: HttpClient and some public methods Remy Maucherat
- HttpClient and documentation Vincent Massol
- Re: HttpClient and documentation Remy Maucherat
- Re: HttpClient and HTTP headers/parameters Remy Maucherat
- HttpClient Summary (WAS Re: HttpClient and HTTP header... Vincent Massol