Re: If this is supposed to be commons, why isn't it common?

[Rodney Waldhoff]

>>
>>Velocity already depends on collections.  What is left for a release? I
>>can do that - I will also make it's build like beanutils for conformity.
>>
>
>AFAIK Collections only needs a little bit of docco (and maybe that's just
>a couple of package.html files to fill in the Javadocs with an overview of
>what's available).  I don't personally need any other functionality in a
>1.0 release.


I thought Collections already was a 1.0 release.  In fact, I'm pretty sure 
it is:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-collections/v1.0/

http://www.mail-archive.com/jakarta-commons@jakarta.apache.org/msg02623.html


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp