Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch

[Jon Stevens]

on 8/14/01 3:05 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If we're going to do something like this, it seems to me we should either
> adopt the "commons logger layer" that Rodney proposed, or bite the bullet
> and pick which logging API we want to support.  It doesn't make sense for
> every commons package "Foo" to create their own "FooLogger" interface.

At this point, after tons and tons of discussion, I have finally agreed with
JVZ and settled on one logging system. Log4J.

I'm actually a bit surprised to see a proposal for an abstraction layer in
the commons.

-jon