on 8/14/01 8:04 PM, "Rodney Waldhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also think it is reasonable for some people to say they want the smallest > JAR/memory footprint that is reasonable. Asking them to include a 15K+ JAR > (I think log4jME was down to ~20K or so) probably isn't very reasonable. Yea, we only have 640k of memory to play with. Right Mr. Gates? :-) -jon
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Sam Ruby
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Rodney Waldhoff
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Jon Stevens
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Glenn McAllister
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Sam Ruby
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch robert burrell donkin
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Jon Stevens
- Re: [SUBMIT] digester logging patch Ceki Gülcü