on 8/14/01 8:04 PM, "Rodney Waldhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I also think it is reasonable for some people to say they want the smallest
> JAR/memory footprint that is reasonable.  Asking them to include a 15K+ JAR
> (I think log4jME was down to ~20K or so) probably isn't very reasonable.

Yea, we only have 640k of memory to play with. Right Mr. Gates?

:-)

-jon

Reply via email to