on 8/15/01 9:22 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fear is that I compose a system with a dozen components, each of which
> has its own wrapper over logging functionality, so the total footprint
> consumed by these wrappers is larger than the logging system which is
> undoubtably going to be including anyway.
>
> Trying to standardize on a wrapper without settling for an absolute least
> common denominator approach essentially is equivalent to selecting a
> logging package with a reasonably good interface, and stripping from
> package the set of backends which are not of interest.
>
> - Sam Ruby
I also think that the standardization of the wrapper should include Ceki in
the discussions. Putting something up in commons and not inviting Ceki
directly is suicide.
-jon
