At 10:16 15.08.2001 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
>on 8/15/01 9:22 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My fear is that I compose a system with a dozen components, each of which
>> has its own wrapper over logging functionality, so the total footprint
>> consumed by these wrappers is larger than the logging system which is
>> undoubtably going to be including anyway.
>>
>> Trying to standardize on a wrapper without settling for an absolute least
>> common denominator approach essentially is equivalent to selecting a
>> logging package with a reasonably good interface, and stripping from
>> package the set of backends which are not of interest.
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
>I also think that the standardization of the wrapper should include Ceki in
>the discussions. Putting something up in commons and not inviting Ceki
>directly is suicide.
Jon,
I appreciate the invitation although suicide is perhaps too harsh a word. It's just
stupid logging after all. :-)
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
