Josh Suereth wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Michael Neale > <michael.ne...@gmail.com <mailto:michael.ne...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Yes I hear that a lot. Jsf2 is *claimed* to be better: would like to > hear from people that have used it (as opposed to vendors). > > I think it's too little, too late for jsf2. > > Also, even if jsf2 is made of awesome: there needs to be a better > track record of keeping up with the web then was shown in the past (a > fast moving jsr? Not likely). > > > > I think I would use any framework made of awesome. I'd probably also > go for a web framework made of peanut butter. I really like peanut > butter. Plus it's malleable, like silly putty. What about a stack made out of turtles?
Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
