This may be exactly why JavaFX might fare better than both Swing and JSF. Code generated by a RAD editors can not be hand coded at the same time, you pretty much have to make the choice up-front, can't have them both. So as a first for the Java world, seems like the round-trip engineering legacy of Visual Basic is being picked up by JavaFX. I hope so anyway. :)
/Casper On 11 Jul., 01:27, Joshua Marinacci <jos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah. One of our goals with JavaFX is to make it tool friendly but you > should still be able to do everything cleanly at the code level. The > APIs and language (JavaFX Script) were designed in parallel to make > that happen. > > - J > > On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joshua Marinacci<jos...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> I don't know the > >> history of JSF (since I wasn't at Sun for part of it and never worked > >> with it), but I suspect lack of focus was a part of it. > > > I suspect some of it was due to a focus on tools vendors. If you're > > using a tool to build an app it doesn't much matter if you have a > > bunch of XML and the tool updates it for you. It's more a problem if > > you're editing things by hand, which is what many of us like to do. > > > Greg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
