Casper Bang wrote: > AFAIK that's entirely up to the native peer, how it chooses to render > - there shouldn't be anything preventing SWT from taking advantage > of the GPU. Then again, this topic is more interesting in Swing since > the whole UI effectively has to be emulated whereas SWT is using > native stuff which is already fast, not just when rendering but also > in regard to event handling and responsiveness.
Cough, cough :-) I've already repeated many times that I'm referring to font rendering, texture, gradients, image rendering... Most of those things are not done by common components (unless you stay with a boring L&F such as that of Eclipse, of course ;-) > > There exists a group of people referring to Swing's vision as a pipe > dream and it's interesting to note that the up-and-coming language > Fan, is using SWT. Last but not least, try asking a visually impaired "The" up-and-coming? Probably you meant "yet-another" ? :-) > user, using a screen reader, what they think of a Swing application. > :) Well, I have co-workers wearing glasses and frankly nobody has ever complained about Swing :-) -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
