But why call it "mscorlib" why not keep nice vendor names out and name it "corlib" ?
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Carl Jokl <carl.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't ðink ðat it is a fair like for like comparison. Given ðat .Net > is made up of modules and ðe JDK is all in one blob, mscorlib is only > equivalent to ðe most core part of ðe Java runtime. Project Jigsaw > seems to be getting Java to be modularised in a similar way to .Net. > If you were to look at all of ðe .Net libraries you would need to be > equivalent to ðe JDK it is certainly not 2mb. Ðe complete .Net runtime > is more like 350mb which is way way bigger ðan ðe JRE. > > All I can say is Huzzah for modularisation. > > On Oct 19, 10:42 am, Miroslav Pokorny <miroslav.poko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > My main point was Microsoft says that they say c# and the clr are a > > standard, so they dont include microsoft in their packages(namesspaces) > > naming and yet we have "mscorlib.dll". > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- mP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
