On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:23 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On 7/14/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i'd recommend going first to maven 1: it's well known, has better > > documentation and we're unlikely to hit any early adopter. once jaxme is > > mavenized then think about moving to maven 2. > > If Nacho volunteers to do it, I'd prefer to let him choose?
fine :) i'm familiar with maven 1 but probably don't have the time to learn maven 2 (which is a comprehensive rewrite and still in alpha). so, i'm not sure i'd be able to help much if nacho decides to go with maven 2... - robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part