No, this option will not bring into libgnomevfs library.
It is just how libgsf configure works. If there is only
"with-gnome-vfs", libgsf depends on gnome-vfs. If "with-gnome-vfs +
with-gio", libgsf depends on gio only.
-rick
Ghee Teo wrote:
> Rick Ju wrote:
>> No, it should be --with-gnome-vfs + --with-gio.
>>
>> gnome-vfs is still needed
> Can you elaborate on this? Does this option brought in libgnomevfs-2.so?
> How is libgnomevfs-2.so required for use?
> I thought gio would have provided at least most of gnomevfs functions.
> If it has not, gvfs should.
> I think we should avoid extending 64-bit libgnomevfs-2 for now:
> - it is obsoleted no going to get on-going maintainance
> - it is very close to FCS build for a large libraries
>
> -Ghee
>
>>
>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>
>>>> +./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
>>>> + --bindir=%{_bindir} \
>>>> + --libdir=%{_libdir} \
>>>> + --includedir=%{_includedir} \
>>>> + --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \
>>>> + --mandir=%{_mandir} \
>>>> + --with-gnome \
>>>> + --with-bz2 \
>>>> + --with-gnome-vfs \
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should not the above be --without-gnome-vfs?
>>>
>>>
>>>> + --with-gio \
>>>> + %gtk_doc_option
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And with the patch, I assume SUNWlibgsf doesn't depend on SUNWgnome-vfs
>>> anymore. So I think you should remove
>>>
>>> Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
>>> and BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
>>>
>>> from SUNWlibgsf.spec.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
