I will fix that.

Ghee Teo wrote:
> Rick Ju wrote:
>> In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
>>
>> By that, I meant its headers files. There is no 64bit gnome-vfs so no 
>> chance libgsf 64bit could depend on that.
> So if only the header files are need, then
> BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
>
> is sufficient.
> Requires: xxxx
> means xxxx must be present to run libgsf.
> Since we know it doesn't based on ldd of libgsf.
> I think it doesn't need Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> -Ghee
>>
>> -rick
>>
>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:14 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>  
>>>> No, this option will not bring into libgnomevfs library.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
>>>
>>> So does SUNWlibgsf depends on SUNWgnome-vfs or not?
>>>
>>> If still depends, your patch is useless before SUNWgnome-vfs have 64 
>>> bit
>>> libraries.
>>>
>>> If not depend, you should remove SUNWgnome-vfs from SUNWlibgsf's
>>> requirement.
>>>
>>>  
>>>> It is just how libgsf configure works. If there is only 
>>>> "with-gnome-vfs", libgsf depends on gnome-vfs. If "with-gnome-vfs + 
>>>> with-gio", libgsf depends on gio only.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> What is the result of "without-gnome-vfs + with-gio"?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harry
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>> -rick
>>>>
>>>> Ghee Teo wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> Rick Ju wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>> No, it should be --with-gnome-vfs + --with-gio.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gnome-vfs is still needed
>>>>>>         
>>>>> Can you elaborate on this? Does this option brought in 
>>>>> libgnomevfs-2.so?
>>>>> How is libgnomevfs-2.so required for use?
>>>>> I thought gio would have provided at least most of gnomevfs 
>>>>> functions.
>>>>> If it has not, gvfs should.
>>>>> I think we should avoid extending 64-bit libgnomevfs-2 for now:
>>>>> - it is obsoleted no going to get on-going maintainance
>>>>> - it is very close to FCS build for a large libraries
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ghee
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> +./configure --prefix=%{_prefix}            \
>>>>>>>> +      --bindir=%{_bindir}                  \
>>>>>>>> +      --libdir=%{_libdir}                  \
>>>>>>>> +      --includedir=%{_includedir}          \
>>>>>>>> +      --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir}          \
>>>>>>>> +      --mandir=%{_mandir}                  \
>>>>>>>> +      --with-gnome                         \
>>>>>>>> +      --with-bz2                           \
>>>>>>>> +      --with-gnome-vfs                     \
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Should not the above be --without-gnome-vfs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> +      --with-gio                           \
>>>>>>>> +      %gtk_doc_option
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> And with the patch, I assume SUNWlibgsf doesn't depend on 
>>>>>>> SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>>>> anymore.  So I think you should remove
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>>>> and BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from SUNWlibgsf.spec.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>             
>>
>
>


Reply via email to