In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
By that, I meant its headers files. There is no 64bit gnome-vfs so no
chance libgsf 64bit could depend on that.
-rick
Harry Lu wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:14 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>
>> No, this option will not bring into libgnomevfs library.
>>
>
> In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
>
> So does SUNWlibgsf depends on SUNWgnome-vfs or not?
>
> If still depends, your patch is useless before SUNWgnome-vfs have 64 bit
> libraries.
>
> If not depend, you should remove SUNWgnome-vfs from SUNWlibgsf's
> requirement.
>
>
>> It is just how libgsf configure works. If there is only
>> "with-gnome-vfs", libgsf depends on gnome-vfs. If "with-gnome-vfs +
>> with-gio", libgsf depends on gio only.
>>
>
> What is the result of "without-gnome-vfs + with-gio"?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Harry
>
>
>
>> -rick
>>
>> Ghee Teo wrote:
>>
>>> Rick Ju wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, it should be --with-gnome-vfs + --with-gio.
>>>>
>>>> gnome-vfs is still needed
>>>>
>>> Can you elaborate on this? Does this option brought in libgnomevfs-2.so?
>>> How is libgnomevfs-2.so required for use?
>>> I thought gio would have provided at least most of gnomevfs functions.
>>> If it has not, gvfs should.
>>> I think we should avoid extending 64-bit libgnomevfs-2 for now:
>>> - it is obsoleted no going to get on-going maintainance
>>> - it is very close to FCS build for a large libraries
>>>
>>> -Ghee
>>>
>>>
>>>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
>>>>>> + --bindir=%{_bindir} \
>>>>>> + --libdir=%{_libdir} \
>>>>>> + --includedir=%{_includedir} \
>>>>>> + --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \
>>>>>> + --mandir=%{_mandir} \
>>>>>> + --with-gnome \
>>>>>> + --with-bz2 \
>>>>>> + --with-gnome-vfs \
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Should not the above be --without-gnome-vfs?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> + --with-gio \
>>>>>> + %gtk_doc_option
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> And with the patch, I assume SUNWlibgsf doesn't depend on SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>> anymore. So I think you should remove
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>> and BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
>>>>>
>>>>> from SUNWlibgsf.spec.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Harry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
