yes. It should be an issue. It is because libgsf configure gives
--with-gnome-vfs higher priority. If gnome-vfs is disabled, it doesn't
check --with-gio at all.
-rick
Harry Lu wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 17:05 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>
>> In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
>>
>> By that, I meant its headers files. There is no 64bit gnome-vfs so no
>> chance libgsf 64bit could depend on that.
>>
>
> So it is BuildRequires SUNWgnome-vfs-devel, not Requires SUNWgnome-vfs.
>
> But is still looks strange that you depend on a header file but not
> their libs.
>
> Harry
>
>
>> -rick
>>
>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:14 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> No, this option will not bring into libgnomevfs library.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
>>>
>>> So does SUNWlibgsf depends on SUNWgnome-vfs or not?
>>>
>>> If still depends, your patch is useless before SUNWgnome-vfs have 64 bit
>>> libraries.
>>>
>>> If not depend, you should remove SUNWgnome-vfs from SUNWlibgsf's
>>> requirement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> It is just how libgsf configure works. If there is only
>>>> "with-gnome-vfs", libgsf depends on gnome-vfs. If "with-gnome-vfs +
>>>> with-gio", libgsf depends on gio only.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What is the result of "without-gnome-vfs + with-gio"?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -rick
>>>>
>>>> Ghee Teo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Rick Ju wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it should be --with-gnome-vfs + --with-gio.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gnome-vfs is still needed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Can you elaborate on this? Does this option brought in libgnomevfs-2.so?
>>>>> How is libgnomevfs-2.so required for use?
>>>>> I thought gio would have provided at least most of gnomevfs functions.
>>>>> If it has not, gvfs should.
>>>>> I think we should avoid extending 64-bit libgnomevfs-2 for now:
>>>>> - it is obsoleted no going to get on-going maintainance
>>>>> - it is very close to FCS build for a large libraries
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ghee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Harry Lu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
>>>>>>>> + --bindir=%{_bindir} \
>>>>>>>> + --libdir=%{_libdir} \
>>>>>>>> + --includedir=%{_includedir} \
>>>>>>>> + --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \
>>>>>>>> + --mandir=%{_mandir} \
>>>>>>>> + --with-gnome \
>>>>>>>> + --with-bz2 \
>>>>>>>> + --with-gnome-vfs \
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should not the above be --without-gnome-vfs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + --with-gio \
>>>>>>>> + %gtk_doc_option
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And with the patch, I assume SUNWlibgsf doesn't depend on SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>>>> anymore. So I think you should remove
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
>>>>>>> and BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from SUNWlibgsf.spec.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
