On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:14 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
> No, this option will not bring into libgnomevfs library.
In your previous mail, you said, "?gnome-vfs is still needed".
So does SUNWlibgsf depends on SUNWgnome-vfs or not?
If still depends, your patch is useless before SUNWgnome-vfs have 64 bit
libraries.
If not depend, you should remove SUNWgnome-vfs from SUNWlibgsf's
requirement.
>
> It is just how libgsf configure works. If there is only
> "with-gnome-vfs", libgsf depends on gnome-vfs. If "with-gnome-vfs +
> with-gio", libgsf depends on gio only.
What is the result of "without-gnome-vfs + with-gio"?
Thanks,
Harry
> -rick
>
> Ghee Teo wrote:
> > Rick Ju wrote:
> >> No, it should be --with-gnome-vfs + --with-gio.
> >>
> >> gnome-vfs is still needed
> > Can you elaborate on this? Does this option brought in libgnomevfs-2.so?
> > How is libgnomevfs-2.so required for use?
> > I thought gio would have provided at least most of gnomevfs functions.
> > If it has not, gvfs should.
> > I think we should avoid extending 64-bit libgnomevfs-2 for now:
> > - it is obsoleted no going to get on-going maintainance
> > - it is very close to FCS build for a large libraries
> >
> > -Ghee
> >
> >>
> >> Harry Lu wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Rick Ju wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
> >>>> + --bindir=%{_bindir} \
> >>>> + --libdir=%{_libdir} \
> >>>> + --includedir=%{_includedir} \
> >>>> + --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \
> >>>> + --mandir=%{_mandir} \
> >>>> + --with-gnome \
> >>>> + --with-bz2 \
> >>>> + --with-gnome-vfs \
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Should not the above be --without-gnome-vfs?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> + --with-gio \
> >>>> + %gtk_doc_option
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And with the patch, I assume SUNWlibgsf doesn't depend on SUNWgnome-vfs
> >>> anymore. So I think you should remove
> >>>
> >>> Requires: SUNWgnome-vfs
> >>> and BuildRequires: SUNWgnome-vfs-devel
> >>>
> >>> from SUNWlibgsf.spec.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Harry
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--
This is a test signature
?This is a test signature