I say drop 1.1 support, but keep 1.2 support in Jess 6.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JESS: JDK 1.1 support in Jess 6
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like some opinions on the idea of dropping Java 1.1 support in
> Jess 6 - i.e., using some Java 2 features. These might include
> Collections, Swing, weak references, Remember that the final
> Jess 6 release is still some time in the future. While you're at it,
> what do you think about using features introduced in JDK 1.3 - i.e.,
> dropping support for JDK 1.2? This would let me use the new dynamic
> proxy class stuff. I guess my personal opinion is that I should drop
> 1.1 support, but not 1.2 yet. What do you think?
>
> Jess 5 dropped JDK 1.0 support, which is why Jess 4.4 is still
> available for download; I suppose we'd continue to offer 5.x after 6.0
> was final for those users that needed 1.1 support.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Ernest Friedman-Hill
> Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
> Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
> Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
> Livermore, CA 94550
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
> list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
