Bill my response to your message is proceeded by "GM":
From: bill cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>though i do not think all of jfw history is all so great.
>first i never got 4.01 to work right, but i do realize i was in the
minority.
>that minority was  of pretty good size though.
GM  I am not sure you were in the minority, many of us did not, while IE5
does work better I am a long ways from being able to read every web page.
While I am ready to consede that part of the problem may be mine.

>still  many people in my opinion act as though the web is everything.
>while it is great to be able to read all kinds of stuff   and while 4.01
was a
>improvement, its access did not ensure that one could easily read all
difficult
>pages.
>nor does the competition.
>for the most part a person is still better off sticking to  text based
layout.
>if they are blind.
>that is if they want the fastest access to information.
GM  I agree with the above.
>much of the rest about the browser is hype.
>what actual percentage of extra info can a person really access as a result
of
>jfw and 4, versus jfw and 3 say?
>
>
>now for some other jfw history,  for 2 years now artic has been able to
read
>the
>control plus alt plus delete  menu.
>
>this allows access to the  end task menu.
>
>while others say that  their is other places where all the features can be
>disabled, this is far from true.
>
>my experience is about half can be deleted their.
>
>and only the end task menu makes this super fast.
>
>well this menu is been in the  operateing system since 95.
>
>all the competition can read it.
>
>but jfw still can not read a major part of the core of the operating
system.
>
>i would much rather have this than all the improvements done in i e 4 put
>together.
>reason being is that  would assist the user in haveing a much more stable
>system.
>if people temporarily remove aps in background during a install, they are
way
>less likely to have trouble with a install.
GM  Here -- here, let me add my approval to this.

George


-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

Reply via email to