>>Q: Would we pick up more users if we did an official release? That is, >> are there people who will not use the beta, but would start using an >> official Jmol v10? > > The beta is fine; it does what I need it to do which is to display > colourful molecules on our web page and also to use it as the engine > behind a database
Good >>Q: Jmol v10 does not support a number of things that were in Jmol v8. >> This includes broader file type support, animations, vibrations, etc. >> Is the absence of these things a *show stopper* for you? > > No; but broader file support & vibs would be nice OK >>Q: What do *you* recommend? > > Don't overburden it with extra 'facilities' Hmmm ... the problem is that Jmol is trying to please a lot of different audiences ... so it is hard to decide what is *extra* I fear that many of the biochemists would say that 'broader file support' and 'vibrations' are *extras* that they don't need ;-) Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
