-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:33, Miguel Howard wrote: > >>Q: What do *you* recommend? > > > > Don't overburden it with extra 'facilities' > > Hmmm ... the problem is that Jmol is trying to please a lot of different > audiences ... so it is hard to decide what is *extra* > > I fear that many of the biochemists would say that 'broader file support' > and 'vibrations' are *extras* that they don't need ;-)
This is where the plugin architecture comes in... The animation stuff is main Jmol, because all the information is in the file... The vibrations in Jmol are currently calculated from vectors, which makes it slightly different as it requires computation. So, things called extra are those things which provide features that do not just display information in files. Display of vibration vectors is main Jmol, but vibration animations, can very well be in a plugin. Egon - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Nijmegen University http://www.cac.sci.kun.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (SunOS) iD8DBQFAKhpWd9R8I9Yza6YRAsY5AJ4oSI24WoaKYts6/BTY+y5E43wVmgCeKIql ZxryQDwPIECS2D9LiLbUi/w= =W3KW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
