With "HTML5" and its multimedia components being finalised (the W3C specification is being edited by one person from Apple, and another from Google!),
http://homepage.mac.com/swain/Macinchem/Reviews/Chemdoodle/chemdoodle_web_components.htm makes for an interesting comparison with Jmol. It is touted as a mechanism for rendering molecules and their properties which does not rely on Java, and other virtual engines. The current functionality is not a patch on Jmol, and I suspect extending chemdoodle to achieve this functionality is going to be non trivial. I wonder nevertheless whether Jmol, or ChemDoodle is the future? Has anyone who has studied ChemDoodle in greater depth prepared to comment on its pros and cons to this forum? -- Henry S Rzepa +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); Blog: http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
