Hell, I liked your post about liking tuna being comparable to sexual desires - who cares where they come from? - they're here, enjoy them.

Maybe we should stop saying "most heterosexuals are. . ." , "most gays prefer. . .", "women usually like. . ." , "men are never able to. . ." and instead, when it comes to sex, just say -- "I like. I prefer. I desire. How about you?"

I read recently that researchers have discovered a new sexual dysfunction of women, requiring a Viagra-like drug, and when you read the "symptoms", they read like any ordinary list of feelings that a woman, or a man, might have from time to time throughout their lives, maybe for a month, maybe for 30 years. Suddenly, we need medication so that we all have the same, strong, regular orgasms, erect enough penises, hard enough nipples, wet enough plumbing. Soon, it'll be drugs to make sure we only want sex at the weekends, to ensure a more productive workforce.

Vive la diffirence! say I.

Sarah


From: "hell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't like tuna - in fact I hate tuna. The slightest smell makes me
physically ill, and a decent whiff will have me retching uncontrollably. I
was brought up to like tuna, and the rest of my family like tuna, so it can't
be environment OR genes? Maybe it's completely inexplicable, and there's no
reason "why" - it just is?

To me the argument about why someone is gay makes about as much sense as what
I've just written above. Does there have to be a reason? And why is everyone
so determined to FIND a reason?

Reply via email to