John, that last resource you posted is great, kangax is the man.
Rick On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I will take a look at this. I may come to different conclusions than > > you, but I will propose something. Having a dump of all the attributes > > and documenting what to expect from each would be fantastic. > > Excellent, appreciate your help! > > Doing a Google Code Search yields lots of interesting edge cases that > we'll want to figure out: > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q= > \.attr\%28%22.*%3F%22+lang%3Ajavascript&sbtn=Search > > > Seems petty to me. There is a good test case there that illustrates > > the problem. I'm not going to reproduce it to shelter jQuery from CLJ. > > "I will take a look at this when I get a chance. I'm not going to copy > his code, but if there are any similarities then he can sue me." > > Huh. Unfortunately we really don't want to deal with their bullshit, > especially if they're threatening to sue us. As we're looking to > transfer ownership of the code base over to the Software Freedom > Conservancy we can't take code from tainted sources - and if you're > unwilling to take responsibility for your code then we really won't be > able to accept code submissions from you. > > Thankfully we can still use your help in figuring out a good situation > for the attributes to be in. Looking forward to your input. > > > Nevertheless, since attr() calls height() for both getter and setter, > > the real problem is that > > $o.height( $o.height() ) > > is not reliable in some cases. So perhaps the issue is there, instead > > of with attr(). > > That seems likely. > > > I've never been a fan of head-in-the-sand. I can find the pearls of > > wisdom in the posts there without taking anything personally. And > > there is a lot of good, robust, deep stuff posted there that you won't > > find in blog posts or discussions here. To each his own. > > Naturally, it's a lot easier to not take it personally when they're > not making personal insults against you and threatening to sue you. > > Thankfully we have people like Juriy Zaytsev that are providing useful > ways of contributing to the larger community: > http://thinkweb2.com/projects/prototype/ > > --John > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
