Thanks for the guidelines. I should have searched here and also google. But your comments helped me. :)
On Nov 1, 4:03 pm, Pops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whoooooa! Rey, what a different between IE and FF. > > I am not interested in the half-truths in any of this, but rather what > does the test show to improve jQuery, if anything? > > -- > HLS > > On Nov 1, 1:59 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Prit, > > > Please do a search in the archives for this topic. Just as early as last > > week, I posted a response to this. > > > Also, be sure to run the same test in IE so you can see totally > > different results. My post goes into detail about that as well. > > > Thanks, > > > Rey... > > > prit wrote: > > > I have tried different javascript frameworks and I finally decided to > > > use jQuery because of the ease of use and all the good plugins > > > available. > > > > But recently I noticed a websitehttp://mootools.net/slickspeed/which > > > compares 3 frameworks including jQuery. I ran the tests on that site > > > and noticed that they show jQuery as the slowest performer out of the > > > 3 frameworks (Mootools, Prototype and jQuery). > > > > Does anybody have comments on this ? > > > > Thanks, > > > Prit
