That's way too much fuss for badly written CSS :)

On Jan 17, 5:10 pm, johny why <johny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
>
> if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
> with your candy css, it MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css--
> causing your candy to display wrong!
>
> fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
> unlikely to arise—and even then, there’s a 50% chance the candy css
> will win!
>
> if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important, then
> you might be able to override it with some javascript and
> getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only option)
>
> w3.org states:
> "getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
> author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
> without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
> the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
> comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
> called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
> over author style sheets. An "!important" declaration still takes
> precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
> sheets all may contain "!important" declarations. User "!important"
> rules take precedence over both override and author "!important"
> rules, and override "!important" rules take precedence over author "!
> important" 
> rules."http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...
>
> in other words, an "override" style marked "!important" is the CSS of
> highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.
>
> if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
> unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
> designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
> ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
> behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
> candy from the site’s css!

Reply via email to