>
> I think this is the final argument that wins many of the problems people
> have posted here. There has been a thread concerning whether to provide
> thread-safe abilities into the servlet engine for sessioning; I think we
> should, especially if non-programmers are the ones using JSP; they
> shouldn't have to understand difficult thread models to use our beans in
> their JSP code! Another long-standing thread concerns scriptlets vs.
> tags;
> I think tags wins out for non-programming users.
We agree hence the tag extension mechanism we will add in JSP 1.1
will allow users to develop libraries of custom tags that will be
portable between JSP engines and tools ...
> There has also
> been discussion of how embedded properties (i.e.
> somebean:someproperty:another property) should be kept. I think they
> should, since they are easier than using scriptlets for non-programmers.
> By the way, why were embedded bean properties dropped for the 1.0 spec?
> Are you guys working on a better way of doing this for 1.1?
>
Unfortunately we are opposed to the concept of embedded properties,
they don't exist in JavaBeans, and exposing a new syntax seems
redundant ... tools support can hide the java code ... so it
does'nt seem necessary ...
Rgds
- Larry Cable
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail: Laurence P. G. Cable,
Java Software,
Sun Microsystems Inc.,
Mailstop UCUP02-201,
Phone : 408-343-1776 (x51776) 901 San Antonio Road
Fax : 408-863-3195 Palo Alto CA 94043.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
