Years ago I had to get a license to make my 10g interfaces work on my MX104
Aaron > On Oct 25, 2023, at 5:03 AM, Tobias Heister via juniper-nsp > <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > Am 25.10.2023 um 11:57 schrieb Xavier Beaudouin via juniper-nsp: >>> So there are a couple of enforced licenses even on MX ... and they have >>> always been enforced. Subscriber MGMT is one of these features. >> Well I remember wanted to use dhcp server on a MX204 for a local lan used >> only... >> for local administrators... that required some license I didn't have.... >> Well this thing was working like a charm on M7i (yeah this is attic I know), >> and >> it never asked me a license for spawning isc-dhcpd ... >> So no this is no more "honor based". >> They copy the worse part of Cisco with their license mess... > > It does not help, but this actually makes sense in a weird way :) > > local dhcp server on MX is considered a feature which sources in the > Subscriber mgmt part of the code and hence depends on the subscriber mgmt > features i mentioned above. And these were always enforced on MX. > > regards > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
