* Karl Gerhard via juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> [2023-10-24 11:18]:
> On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote:
> > Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will
> > just grump at you on commits.
> It depends. MACSEC on EX and QFX first had a license warning and a
> permanent minor alert when configured on these platforms. With Junos
> 18 they introduced MACSEC License Enforcement, i.e. no more MACSEC
> for you if you don't have a valid license installed.
Yeah it depends. Our MX204 also needed licenses for subscriber
managment. Some options would produce a license warning and some other
stuff just failed silently which was worse. Also noone at Juniper
seemed to know WHICH licenses we needed for our usecase.
In the end our license list looked like this:
subscriber-accounting
subscriber-authentication
subscriber-address-assignment
subscriber-vlan
subscriber-ip
scale-subscriber
scale-l2tp
l2tp-inline-lns
So yeah.. that wasn't a nice experience at all.
Best Regards
Sebastian
--
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
