On 12 January 2015 at 14:59, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> wrote:
> Thanks Oliver, > > Exacty the feedback I was looking for. > > I also prefer simple, but I wasn't quite sure what direction the project > wanted to take so I simply decided to follow the echo-style > framework approach. Hence my recommendation to use Vaadin. > > But hey... I'm not wedded to Vaadin in any way, so I'm more than happy to > use a totally diferent approach. > > How about I resurrect the JS webapp stuff I worked on and make an > alternative proposal more in line with what you suggested? I promise I'll > be just as motivated :o) > Sure be motivated!! :-) What js techo will you be happy to use? Olivier > > cheers -- Randall > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Yup Vaadin is suitable. > > I personally prefer don't use it and most of the time very happy to use a > > simple js frontend with REST services architecture. > > But that's only my POV and as you look really motivated to do the stuff > > with Vaadin I won't complain too much :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Happy to chase down more detail with some guidance... > > > > > > cheers -- Randall > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
