you have some nice other options as: knockout (http://knockoutjs.com/) , ember (http://emberjs.com/) or react (http://facebook.github.io/react/) I already used both knockout and ember, I found them very convenient. The new react sounds promising. Yup they are not as trendy as angular because they have the google marketing power :-) But they are stable, performant and take care of backward compat...
:-) On 20 January 2015 at 22:20, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > I reckon with all the recent changes with the angular dev I'm less > enthusiast > Read: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2015/01/the_problem_wit.html > > On 14 January 2015 at 15:05, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> wrote: > >> I'm not a guru in any particular JS framework (but I can learn quick >> enough), so I'm happy to follow your guys preferences from an >> overall project perspective. >> >> AngularJS was at the top of my list, not to mention that JB had already >> recommended it (I know, that should have been a clue). >> >> Your thoughts? >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > On 12 January 2015 at 14:59, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks Oliver, >> > > >> > > Exacty the feedback I was looking for. >> > > >> > > I also prefer simple, but I wasn't quite sure what direction the >> project >> > > wanted to take so I simply decided to follow the echo-style >> > > framework approach. Hence my recommendation to use Vaadin. >> > > >> > > But hey... I'm not wedded to Vaadin in any way, so I'm more than >> happy to >> > > use a totally diferent approach. >> > > >> > > How about I resurrect the JS webapp stuff I worked on and make an >> > > alternative proposal more in line with what you suggested? I promise >> > I'll >> > > be just as motivated :o) >> > > >> > >> > Sure be motivated!! :-) >> > What js techo will you be happy to use? >> > >> > Olivier >> > >> > >> > > >> > > cheers -- Randall >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Yup Vaadin is suitable. >> > > > I personally prefer don't use it and most of the time very happy to >> > use a >> > > > simple js frontend with REST services architecture. >> > > > But that's only my POV and as you look really motivated to do the >> stuff >> > > > with Vaadin I won't complain too much :-) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Happy to chase down more detail with some guidance... >> > > > > >> > > > > cheers -- Randall >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Olivier Lamy >> > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Olivier Lamy >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
