I'm not a guru in any particular JS framework (but I can learn quick
enough), so I'm happy to follow your guys preferences from an
overall project perspective.

AngularJS was at the top of my list, not to mention that JB had already
recommended it (I know, that should have been a clue).

Your thoughts?


On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 12 January 2015 at 14:59, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Oliver,
> >
> > Exacty the feedback I was looking for.
> >
> > I also prefer simple, but I wasn't quite sure what direction the project
> > wanted to take so I simply decided to follow the echo-style
> > framework approach.  Hence my recommendation to use Vaadin.
> >
> > But hey... I'm not wedded to Vaadin in any way, so I'm more than happy to
> > use a totally diferent approach.
> >
> > How about I resurrect the JS webapp stuff I worked on and make an
> > alternative proposal more in line with what you suggested?  I promise
> I'll
> > be just as motivated  :o)
> >
>
> Sure be motivated!! :-)
> What js techo will you be happy to use?
>
> Olivier
>
>
> >
> > cheers -- Randall
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yup Vaadin is suitable.
> > > I personally prefer don't use it and most of the time very happy to
> use a
> > > simple js frontend with REST services architecture.
> > > But that's only my POV and as you look really motivated to do the stuff
> > > with Vaadin I won't complain too much :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Happy to chase down more detail with some guidance...
> > > >
> > > > cheers -- Randall
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Olivier Lamy
> > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

Reply via email to