That was a very interesting article, made some good points. What I'm doing at the moment is building a REST api for kalumet, once that's going I'll start playing with some js.
Watch this space, almost there On Jan 29, 2015 2:25 PM, "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > you have some nice other options as: knockout (http://knockoutjs.com/) , > ember (http://emberjs.com/) or react (http://facebook.github.io/react/) > I already used both knockout and ember, I found them very convenient. > The new react sounds promising. > Yup they are not as trendy as angular because they have the google > marketing power :-) > But they are stable, performant and take care of backward compat... > > :-) > > > On 20 January 2015 at 22:20, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I reckon with all the recent changes with the angular dev I'm less > > enthusiast > > Read: > http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2015/01/the_problem_wit.html > > > > On 14 January 2015 at 15:05, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> wrote: > > > >> I'm not a guru in any particular JS framework (but I can learn quick > >> enough), so I'm happy to follow your guys preferences from an > >> overall project perspective. > >> > >> AngularJS was at the top of my list, not to mention that JB had already > >> recommended it (I know, that should have been a clue). > >> > >> Your thoughts? > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On 12 January 2015 at 14:59, Dietz, Randall <rand...@dietz.id.au> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Thanks Oliver, > >> > > > >> > > Exacty the feedback I was looking for. > >> > > > >> > > I also prefer simple, but I wasn't quite sure what direction the > >> project > >> > > wanted to take so I simply decided to follow the echo-style > >> > > framework approach. Hence my recommendation to use Vaadin. > >> > > > >> > > But hey... I'm not wedded to Vaadin in any way, so I'm more than > >> happy to > >> > > use a totally diferent approach. > >> > > > >> > > How about I resurrect the JS webapp stuff I worked on and make an > >> > > alternative proposal more in line with what you suggested? I > promise > >> > I'll > >> > > be just as motivated :o) > >> > > > >> > > >> > Sure be motivated!! :-) > >> > What js techo will you be happy to use? > >> > > >> > Olivier > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > cheers -- Randall > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Yup Vaadin is suitable. > >> > > > I personally prefer don't use it and most of the time very happy > to > >> > use a > >> > > > simple js frontend with REST services architecture. > >> > > > But that's only my POV and as you look really motivated to do the > >> stuff > >> > > > with Vaadin I won't complain too much :-) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Happy to chase down more detail with some guidance... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > cheers -- Randall > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Olivier Lamy > >> > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Olivier Lamy > >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
